[tech] morwong NFS speed problem
Alastair Irvine
alastair at ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au
Tue Jul 12 15:22:00 WST 2005
On Tue, 12 July, 2005 at 02:15:24PM +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Alastair: get some hard figures. "pretty crap" is very useless.
> Some throughputs with testing examples would be nice.
Fine. (Although I should not have to justify myself here unless my
judgement counts for nothing. I've been around long enough for "pretty
crap" to indicate something serious.)
morwong% time cat {~50MiB file} > /dev/null
0.006u 0.872s 12:04.65 0.1% 0+2k 5900+0io 0pf+0w
mussel% time cat {~50MiB file} > /dev/null
0.006u 0.364s 0:05.01 7.1% 0+0k 0+0io 0pf+0w
And also,
mussel% time cat {~2MiB file} > /dev/null
0.000u 0.014s 0:00.34 2.9% 0+0k 0+0io 0pf+0w
morwong% time cat {~2MiB file} > /dev/null
0.003u 0.053s 0:31.50 0.1% 0+2k 238+2io 1pf+0w
For those who haven't used the csh "time" command before, those first three
fields in the output are userspace time-in-seconds, kernel time-in-seconds
and elapsed time in minutes:seconds. The sixth field is supposed to be
number of blocks read/written during I/O operations (I can't figure out why
this is 0 on Linux).
And for the record, the "pretty crap" measurement came from running mutt
on a ~8MiB mailbox. It loaded very slowly on morwong and quickly on
mussel.
>
> Specifically, the mounting is v3 nfs over TCP. This is good but it might
> not actually be optimal for this platform. There's plenty of space to
> tweak NFS. What you really need to come up with is an objective way
> of measuring "crap". :-)
--
... "What else is on?" "Yeah, let's see what else is on." "Where's the TV guide?"
-- The 2 garage attendants, at the end of "The Truman Show"
_____________________________________________________________________
| |
| -=*Alastair Irvine*=- <http://www.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au/~alastair/> |
| C-monkey/wanderer/board&RPGer/net-nut alastair at ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au |
|_____________________________________________________________________|
More information about the tech
mailing list