[tech] Burner vs. Diablo 2 (Re: [ucc] AGM Minutes)

[Elixxir]

On Fri, 22 Mar 2002, Pink Floyd wrote:

> On Fri, 22 Mar 2002, Matt Johnston wrote:
> 
> > <snip dynamic, innovative, exciting stuff>
> > <grats to new committee>
> 
> > VP report
> > Diablo 2 and other gaming was kind of irritating
> 
> Yay to that - diablo 2 takes up a productive PC that could be running zmud
> 
*snip*

Yeah...I mean I have nothing against the guys that play Diablo 2 (great
game) but I have one quibble. The burner's on the Windoze box :-|

Now, whenever someone wants to burn something they can't...as both burning
and Diablo 2 take a heck of a lot of time. Can I suggest that a dedicated
box be set up for the burner[1]  and call it the "Burning only box" or
simmilar (ie. people that want to burn have priority over others).

A low end pentium should suffice and when set up with linux would be great
:)
(although linux doesn't run Nero...which is a minus I can live with)

I'm willing to help set this up if anyone agrees (I know this subject is
best brought up in a meeting but what the heck...)

Cheers,
Paul

[1] if this is done, a new burner is a must (2x is a bit antiquated.. :P )